mirror of
https://github.com/xiaoyifang/goldendict-ng.git
synced 2024-11-23 20:14:05 +00:00
clean: delete wall of text in wstring.hh
This commit is contained in:
parent
2b98b506fe
commit
ba97a9ca87
|
@ -1,52 +1,17 @@
|
|||
/* This file is (c) 2008-2012 Konstantin Isakov <ikm@goldendict.org>
|
||||
* Part of GoldenDict. Licensed under GPLv3 or later, see the LICENSE file */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef __WSTRING_HH_INCLUDED__
|
||||
#define __WSTRING_HH_INCLUDED__
|
||||
#pragma once
|
||||
|
||||
#include <string>
|
||||
|
||||
/// While most systems feature a 4-byte wchar_t and an UCS-4 Unicode
|
||||
/// characters representation for it, Windows uses 2-byte wchar_t and an UTF-16
|
||||
/// encoding. The use of UTF-16 on Windows is most probably a homeage to an
|
||||
/// ancient history dating back to when there was nothing but a BMP, and
|
||||
/// all Unicode chars were 2 bytes long. After the Unicode got expanded past
|
||||
/// two-byte representation, the guys at Microsoft had probably decided that
|
||||
/// the least painful way to go is to just switch to UTF-16. Or so's the theory.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Now, the UTF family is an encoding, made for transit purposes -- is not a
|
||||
/// representation. While it's good for passthrough, it's not directly
|
||||
/// applicable for manipulation on Unicode symbols. It must be decoded first to
|
||||
/// a normal UCS. Think like this: UTF to UCS is something like Base64 to ASCII.
|
||||
/// Aliases for legacy reasons.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The distinction between Microsoft platform and all other ones is that while
|
||||
/// the latters are stuck in an 8-bit era and use UTF-8 to pass unicode around
|
||||
/// through its venerable interfaces, the former one is stuck in a 16-bit era,
|
||||
/// and uses UTF-16 instead. Neither solution allows for direct processing of
|
||||
/// the symbols in those strings without decoding them first. And the 16-bit
|
||||
/// solution is even more ugly than the 8-bit one, because it doesn't have a
|
||||
/// benefit of ASCII compatibility, having a much more useless UCS-2
|
||||
/// compatibility instead. It's stuck in the middle of nowhere, really.
|
||||
/// For new code, just use the standardized std::u32string for UTF-32 strings instead.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The question is, what are we going to do with all this? When we do Unicode
|
||||
/// processing in GoldenDict, we want to use real Unicode characters, not some
|
||||
/// UTF-16 encoded ones. To that end, we have two options under Windows: first,
|
||||
/// use QString, and second, use basic_string< unsigned int >.
|
||||
/// While we use QStrings for the GUI and other non-critical code, there is a
|
||||
/// serious doubt on the efficiency of QStrings for bulk text processing. And
|
||||
/// since a lot of code uses wstring already, it would be much easier to convert
|
||||
/// it to use basic_string< unsigned int > instead, since it shares the same
|
||||
/// template, and therefore the interface too, with wstring. That's why we
|
||||
/// introduce our own gd::wstring and gd::wchar types here. On all systems but
|
||||
/// Windows, they are equivalent to std::wstring and wchar_t. On Windows, they
|
||||
/// are basic_string< unsigned int > and unsigned int.
|
||||
///
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Now we have a better built-in type as char32_t and std::u32string
|
||||
|
||||
namespace gd {
|
||||
typedef char32_t wchar;
|
||||
typedef std::u32string wstring;
|
||||
} // namespace gd
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue